- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 11 months ago by
David.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 26, 2021 at 11:36 pm #1750346
Afreen
Hi,
Lcp on mobile is more than 4s, could you please help me out how to low it? I place the link on the private.
April 27, 2021 at 1:55 am #1750447David
StaffCustomer SupportHi there,
the Image in the Cover Block ( which is the LCP element ) is over 360kb. Would recommend uploading a better optimized image – for above the fold images particularly you want them as smaall as possible.
April 28, 2021 at 1:01 am #1752268Afreen
Thanks David,
I have a similar kind of Issue on LCP on my other website, as the LCP is around 4s on mobile but on desktop it’s good, Please the link on the private.
Thanks,
April 28, 2021 at 4:24 am #1752683David
StaffCustomer SupportI checked that site and the FCP is 2.8s and the LCP is 3.2s.
The 0.4 sec difference between the two is very reasonable and for the LCP being an image it is very acceptable.So you need to focus on the FCP time – any improvments here will improve LCP.
In the PSI report – there are a few opportunities for improvement.
1. Eliminate render-blocking resources
2. Reduce initial server response timeYou should first speak to your host about #2 – as improving the response time will benefit #1.
April 29, 2021 at 12:32 am #1754765Afreen
Hi David,
You know how painful is to change the host, anyhow I would like your advice If I go for the cloaudflare paid service then can be a chance to improve it?
What are the best hosting services in your advice?
Thanks,
April 29, 2021 at 3:44 am #1755100David
StaffCustomer SupportBefore rushing in to changing hosts or paying for services, its worth testing your site on a service like this:
Choose a server that is closer to your host and your website audience. If you’re getting good results ‘locally’ then those timings should get reflected in the Field Data that google will collect. But i would advise optimizing your site images 🙂
Hosting wise – we use Kinsta, and have used Digital Ocean in the past. All are very high grade. I also run some sites on Siteground where cost is an issue and have achieved very good results with them.
CDN wise, i would only opt for that if i am targeting a global audience – if your users are localised then its not a real benefit and may not necessarily improve the page speed scores that Google generates.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.