Black Friday sale! Get up to 25% off GP Premium! Learn more ➝

[Support request] Schema markup – Microdata vs JSON-LD

Home Forums Support [Support request] Schema markup – Microdata vs JSON-LD

Home Forums Support Schema markup – Microdata vs JSON-LD

  • This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by Burt.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
  • #442736

    Hey Tom!

    I see that GeneratePress has some basic blog schema markup built in, which is really all I expect, because you can’t add everything… however, I’m really curious why you are using Microdata (hatom) markup vs JSON-LD.

    1. JSON-LD is actually the recommended method by Google. (
    2. Google can read JSON-LD data that is dynamically injected from Javascript code and embedded widgets.

    Both Google and Bing support JSON-LD and it seems to be where all the schema markup is going. Perhaps for basic sites, JSON-LD doesn’t really differ that much over microdata (other than the language). But was just curious if you had looked into this at all 🙂

    Lead Developer
    Lead Developer

    Hey Brian,

    I’ve been wanting to look into this for a while now – thanks for the resource!

    From what I can see, instead of adding the microdata to the elements, we add any applicable page information into a script in the footer. Very interesting indeed.

    Thank you!


    Brian / Tom

    JSON-LD makes schema markup a real joy – I often create a custom options panel with custom fields to simplify the creation of the JSON-LD script and attach it directly to the page.

    Unless it has recently changed I am not aware that Bing supports JSON-LD – hopefully, I am wrong on this point


    Ya I think Bing does, although I haven’t tested this… I’ve seen SEOs mention they’ve seen JSON-LD working on Bing. Perhaps they just didn’t update their docs yet?


    Well this is good news

    Looks like it is at least a partial support – I see a site that has some reviews with only JSON-LD ( as the microdata is commented out ).

    Definitely does look like is supporting recipes. Back only a few years ago, adding the schema/microdata mark up was the single simplest task to dramatically increase your CTR – Now, it seems so hit and miss and I am not sure if it really worth the time to go full out – beyond the basics – for most sites.

    Thanks for the update

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.